InfoBrief - March 7, 2006
US Current Affairs and Media
- Amazon Alliance, Colombian Human Rights Commission, Lutheran World Relief, and USOC Organize Briefing with Indigenous Leaders Alternative development, peace processes, and
forestry
laws as they affect indigenous groups in Colombia
were some of the themes discussed last week at a
congressional briefing with two indigenous leaders
from Colombia. Luis Evelis Andrade, President of the
National Indigenous Organization of Colombia (ONIC)
and Jairo Valencia Restrepo, National Advisor for the
Colombian National Coca Eradication Project (PNDA-
PLANTE) both spoke about their work and the overall
situation for indigenous groups in Colombia. Luis
Andrade outlined three concerns for indigenous
groups in Colombia: the lack of state attention to
health and human services for indigenous groups, the
continuation of armed conflict, and the form in which
development programs are implemented. Jairo
Valencia discussed eradication as a means of
weakening guerrilla and paramilitary groups,
emphasizing the additional need for a dismantling of
the organizational structures of these groups. Jamila
Thompson from the office of Congresswoman Barbara
Lee, another sponsor of the event, highlighted her
office’s attempts to redirect 40% of Plan Colombia funding for alternative development programs.
- Quarterly Report of the Mission to Support the Peace Process in Colombia (MAPP/OEA) Highlights Flaws in Paramilitary Demobilization The Secretary General on the MAPP/OEA submitted a
sixth quarterly report to the OAS Permanent Council
last week, in which it raised several concerns about
the way in which the paramilitary demobilization is
progressing. Among these was the alarming ratio of
weapons surrendered or destroyed to the number of
men demobilized. In some areas, the percentage of
weapons surrendered compared to combatants
demobilized was as low as 24.5%. In addition, the
report outlined three specific phenomena that are
particularly disconcerting. The first, the regrouping
of ex-combatants into criminal gangs, generally
occurs “in regions where guerrilla activity is low and the entry of the forces of law and order has not been effective,” according to the report. These gangs resume criminal activities such as extortion, social cleansing, and levies on drug production that were formerly carried out by larger paramilitary groups. This has been witnessed in several areas, including Palmito, Sucre department, and the municipalities of Majagual, Guaranda, and Montelíbanoa among others. The report also identified holdout fronts or groups that refused to demobilize as detrimental to the process. These groups “are organically parts of the armed units of demobilized groups, and they continue to pursue the same criminal activities in their spheres of influence.” The last main concern listed in the report is the emergence of new armed actors and/or the strengthening of those already in existence. Essentially, this involves the cessation of resources and operations to co-opted ex-combatants or newly recruited members. The report noted that this occurs principally in areas with “consolidated illegal economies.” Overall, the MAPP/OEA report highlighted the need for financial support to continue effective operations in Colombia, and the importance of the Mission as a vehicle for verifying the process of demobilization. It urged the OAS to give strong support to the Colombian government as the demobilization process progresses, and emphasized external verification as a means of properly executing this process.
Upcoming Events in the US
- Ecumenical Advocacy Days are almost here! Come
be a part of "the largest national gathering of U.S. grassroots progressive religious activists focused on the broad spectrum of international and domestic policies." The conference runs from March 10-13 in and around Washington, DC.
|
|
The U.S. Office on Colombia is an independent non-profit
organization, not affiliated with any political party, that seeks to educate
U.S. policymakers, the media and the U.S. public about the impact of U.S.
policy on Colombia.
|